We’ve got BVE2016 coming up and one of the things root6 will be showing is an HDR workflow via Media Composer using Canon monitors.
HDR is still a bit of a crap-shoot as far as standardisation is concerned with the BBC/NHK system, Dolby Vision, Sony’s SLog3 and Canon’s camera-native CLog. The principle of using an alternate gamma so that you concentrate the bit-depth where you want the extra range is well established:
The hope is that all of these manufacturers will coalesce around ST.2084 which (amongst other things) defines how you handle the specular highlights; those very bright parts of the picture which give a real addition to the look of the pictures. These are typically defined to be >500 Cd/m2 which is MUCH brighter than broadcast white! The idea is that the last bit of dynamic range (10th bit – all values above 512) represent the highlights and everything up to 50% is akin to the usual video dynamic range. You calibrate the monitor such that 50% is set at 100Cd/m2 and just hope that the colourimetry of the highlights tracks RGB-wise!
So – Dave Skeggs and I set off around Soho and London Bridge to capture some night time and daytime footage. We were using a Canon C300 mk.2 (thanks hireacamera) set to UHD (3840 x 2160) at 25P (no interlaced fields at UHD and no high framerates at that resolution unfortunately). We set the colour space to an optimistic Rec.2020 and gamma to C-log. In that mode the camera shoots 410mBit/s XAVC codec MXF files.
We’ve been using Media Composer v 8.5 on an HP Z840 workstation & the new Avid Artist |DNxIO video hardware; we had to update the firmware to get it to generate quad-link SDI. Although HDMI works it is nobbled down to eight-bit and so would not be suitable for this test. I would put a link to the video but none of the video sharing sites support HDR and neither does the screen of your tablet/laptop/TV! I took all the monitor photos with my Fuji bridge-camera in a very bright office; you’ll have to take my word for it!
Notice the headlights of the taxi – you can see details inside the light!
exactly the same frame; notice the dark details in the trees against the night-sky.
Of course on Media Composer’s GUI display you get the CLog gamma rendered as if it was Rec.709 and so it looks very washed out and lacking in detail
You can have Avid flatten the gamma of source clips so that it looks OK on the GUI – that doesn’t affect sequences that the clip has been used in.
Quite a large range of alternate gamma and colour spaces
It shows up in the bin-view which is useful
So now clicking the source window and setting the monitor to regular HD gamma (BT. 1886 fact fans) shows you what the same material shot on a “regular” camera would look like; very little detail in the blacks and none in the whites.
root6’s own DOP; Dave “is that in focus?” Skeggs
I’d forgotten how limited a normal video-camera’s dynamic range was. The Canon monitors top out the specular highlights at 400Cd/m2 which is somewhat less than a Sony BVM-X300 (1,000 Cd/m2!) but for €10k less than the Sony (and losing only a stop-and-a-half of specular highlights) the Canon 30″ UHD/4k IPS panel represents superb value. I was a bit disappointed that the camera tops out at 29.97P at >2k resolution so I couldn’t see how nice fluid video motion looked at high res; everything has a jerky film-look to it.
Steve Shaw at Light Illusion has a very good article exploring some of the fundamentals of HDR.